Posts Tagged ‘Opportunity Gap’

Rochester Public Schools Releases MCA-II Results

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

schoolguysblog

The Minnesota Department of Education recently released the results of the 2008-09 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments, or MCA-IIs.

During the 2005-06 school year, Minnesota shifted its accountability tests from the MCA to the MCA-II. School year 2008-09 was the fourth year that approximately 9,300 District students took the MCA-II tests in reading and the MCA-II/MTELL tests in math. Listed below is the percentage of District students who are meeting or exceeding state standards, as compared with state results.

Percentage of ELEMENTARY Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

  

All

        Asian PI1

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP2

        SpEd3

        FRP4

RPS District         78.26%        77.36%

        54.44%

        55.25%

        84.67%

        47.00%

        47.81%

        59.16%

State         75.03%        64.50%

        51.43%

        49.48%

        82.03%

        39.68%

        42.60%

        57.73%

1. Asian/Pacific Islander, 2.Limited English Proficient, 3. Special Education, 4. Free and Reduced Price Lunch

Percentage of ELEMENTARY Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

    

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         76.01%        78.03%

        53.41%

        48.51%

        82.56%

        47.21%

        46.45%

        56.96%

State         71.88%        66.04%

        47.81%

        43.86%

        78.89%

        41.02%

        43.49%

        53.85%

Percentage of MIDDLE SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         74.05%        69.05%

        44.00%

        44.77%

        81.30%

        31.20%

        33.88%

        50.31%

State         68.05%        56.80%

        42.69%

        40.93%

        74.73%

        23.87%

        27.69%

        47.47%

Percentage of MIDDLE SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         69.32%        72.08%

        37.14%

        35.37%

        76.44%

        34.12%

        29.97%

        44.25%

State         60.44%        57.56%

        32.80%

        27.96%

        67.38%

        24.33%

        21.87%

       38.85%

Percentage of HIGH SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         78.56%        73.81%

        61.22%

        35.77%

        85.88%

        25.42%

        34.38%

        52.03%

State         74.16%        58.53%

        47.08%

        42.29%

        81.08%

        27.10%

        31.43%

        51.91%

Percentage of HIGH SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         54.99%        49.47%

        25.71%

        8.89%

        61.57%

        6.58%

        14.71%

        22.89%

State         41.03%        35.06%

        15.58%

        10.09%

        46.55%

        10.09%

        6.97%

        19.47%

Percentage of All Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

 

    All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         76.50%        73.27%

        51.27%

        48.21%

        83.40%

        38.47%

        40.07%

        54.70%

State         71.92%        60.40%

        47.34%

        44.93%

        78.74%

        32.35%

        34.90%

        52.67%

Percentage of All Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

 

      All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         70.22%        72.03%

        45.10%

        38.74%

        76.72%

        38.93%

        36.20%

        48.57%

       State         62.32%        58.07%

        38.25%

        32.72%

        68.81%

        31.55%

        29.91%

        43.37%

“I am proud of our students and staff for their continued focus on student success,” said Dr. Romain Dallemand, Superintendent. “At a district level, the proficiency rates for nearly all sub groups are rising for the second year in a row, and once again, our District scores exceed those of the state.”

The MCA-IIs are used to determine whether or not states are meeting target goals for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), as required by the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation. NCLB also requires all students, including nine different subgroups, to be proficient in reading and math by the 2013-2014 school year.

During the month of July, Rochester Public Schools will review MCA-II data for accuracy, will review AYP preliminary results, and will prepare appropriate AYP appeals to submit to the state. As required by NCLB, schools must meet their target AYP goals in all subgroup populations. Schools that do not meet all their AYP goals are cited by the Minnesota Department of Education and placed on the state’s “Needs Improvement” list.

In August, Rochester Public Schools will report district and school AYP results as well as the Minnesota Department of Education Growth Data for MCA-II tests. MCA-II Science results will also be reported. In September, Rochester Public Schools will complete district specific analysis of school level results and will complete effectiveness studies related to interventions and supports.

Statement from Superintendent Romain Dallemand regarding MCA-II Results

I am very pleased that students’ proficiency on the District’s MCA-II assessments results increased again this year. This is important feedback to the District and an indication that we’re on the right track for raising proficiency for all students. At a District level, the proficiency rates for nearly all sub groups are rising for the second year in a row, and once again, our District scores exceed those of the state.

As part of the Five Year Plan, we will continue to monitor student achievement, will learn from successful instructional strategies employed in classrooms across the District, and will adjust instructional strategies where improvements and growth must be made.

Student success is a result of the dedication of many people. I am grateful to the teachers, paraprofessionals, administrators, parents, and community for their hard work and continued focus on the proficiency of all our students.  Most of all, I am pleased that our students’ efforts have resulted in continued growth.

All Means All: Great Education Results Celebrated

Friday, June 5th, 2009

johnandpatweb2

Statement of community members responding to recent reports of results of the Five Year Plan initiatives - June 5, 2009

Two weeks ago, representatives of a variety of community organizations interested in education gathered for presentations on programs and initiatives included in the district’s Five-Year Plan. These presentations provided the results of the most recent assessments of student progress.

These results are remarkable. Frankly, those of us who heard them that morning were thrilled. We committed ourselves to sharing this good news – this great news – with the community.

While the community has spent much of the year focused on other issues, something else was going on in schools and homes throughout the district. Teachers were teaching. Parents were engaging. Students were learning. Gaps were closing.

The results reported to us on May 22nd demonstrate that, in the first year of its implementation, the district’s Five-Year Plan to close the opportunity gap is indeed succeeding. It is succeeding to the benefit of all students- all students.

Even though there may be questions about our school district, we believe the most important question is: how are our students doing? The answer given in these results is: our students are doing better – in fact, better than we hoped.

Even though there may be questions about any plan implemented to improve education in our district, we believe the most important question is: is the plan working? The answer given in these results is: the plan is working – in fact, it is exceeding our expectations.

The results also begin to provide an answer to that other question with which the community wrestles – can all students improve their performance? The answer to that question is: yes, all students can improve - all means all.

Here are the results we heard that we want to share with the community:

(1) ALL MEANS ALL.
a. Not only is the achievement gap narrowing, the proficiency gap for all students is closing.
b. Registrations for advance placement [AP] classes are up in all three district high schools.

(2) ALL MEANS EVEN MORE THAN WE EXPECTED.
a. The Five Year Plan interventions that provided additional time and support needed for students who have historically underachieved are good for ALL students.
b. Students enrolled in Read 180, Mathletics, and Voyager Math are showing exceptional growth.
c. These results are being seen not only in Tier 1 schools where the Five Year Plan interventions have been initially launched, but also (in the case of Read 180 and Voyager Math) in Tier 2 and 3 schools that have adapted these interventions early based upon the strong research supporting them.

(3) ALL TAKES ALL.
a. These results are not an indication of a school system that was somehow broken and is now getting somehow fixed. On the contrary, these results are possible because a school system that was strong is now getting stronger. These results are built upon a strong educational foundation already in place.
b. ALL that a student experiences in our schools – the complete educational experience that includes excellent instruction and a strong core curriculum – produces these results.
c. ALL of us who care about students are required to help them make these results possible.

In sum, here are what we believe are the important questions for this district and the answers the results are now giving us:allmeansall

• Are students doing better? YES
• Is the Five Year Plan working? YES
• Does all mean all? YES

In closing we would add:

• Do we owe ALL who have taken up the hard work of making our schools stronger our thanks and continued support? YES
• Do we owe ALL students - who do the hard work of learning, who embrace these opportunities to achieve and improve - our admiration, best wishes, and whatever it takes to ensure their continued success? Emphatically, yes, YES, we do.

____________________

The following persons were participants in the discussions that resulted in the statement above (affiliations are included for reference): Dave Beal, United Way of Olmsted County; John Edmonds, Olmsted County; Karen Erlenbusch, United Way of Olmsted County; Patrick Gannon, Child Care Resource and Referral; Jenny Hegland, Winona State University – Rochester; Margo Herman, University of Minnesota Youth Work Institute; Kay Hocker, Diversity Council; Marlene Jehnke, Girl Scouts; Colleen Maddox, Rochester Community and Technical College; Mike Podulke, Olmsted County; Nancy Sears, Reading Center; Sandy Simar, Head Start; Kristine Stensland, Child Care Resource and Referral; George B. Thompson, Community Member; Barbara Zelinske, Reading Center.

This group is grateful for the opportunity to discuss the results reported above with the following representatives of the district: Fred Daly, Board member; Susanne Griffin-Ziebart, Executive Director of School Improvement and Accountability; and Rachel Hicks, Communication Coordinator.