Advancing the Common Good

Rochester Public Schools Releases MCA-II Results

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

schoolguysblog

The Minnesota Department of Education recently released the results of the 2008-09 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments, or MCA-IIs.

During the 2005-06 school year, Minnesota shifted its accountability tests from the MCA to the MCA-II. School year 2008-09 was the fourth year that approximately 9,300 District students took the MCA-II tests in reading and the MCA-II/MTELL tests in math. Listed below is the percentage of District students who are meeting or exceeding state standards, as compared with state results.

Percentage of ELEMENTARY Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

  

All

        Asian PI1

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP2

        SpEd3

        FRP4

RPS District         78.26%        77.36%

        54.44%

        55.25%

        84.67%

        47.00%

        47.81%

        59.16%

State         75.03%        64.50%

        51.43%

        49.48%

        82.03%

        39.68%

        42.60%

        57.73%

1. Asian/Pacific Islander, 2.Limited English Proficient, 3. Special Education, 4. Free and Reduced Price Lunch

Percentage of ELEMENTARY Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

    

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         76.01%        78.03%

        53.41%

        48.51%

        82.56%

        47.21%

        46.45%

        56.96%

State         71.88%        66.04%

        47.81%

        43.86%

        78.89%

        41.02%

        43.49%

        53.85%

Percentage of MIDDLE SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         74.05%        69.05%

        44.00%

        44.77%

        81.30%

        31.20%

        33.88%

        50.31%

State         68.05%        56.80%

        42.69%

        40.93%

        74.73%

        23.87%

        27.69%

        47.47%

Percentage of MIDDLE SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         69.32%        72.08%

        37.14%

        35.37%

        76.44%

        34.12%

        29.97%

        44.25%

State         60.44%        57.56%

        32.80%

        27.96%

        67.38%

        24.33%

        21.87%

       38.85%

Percentage of HIGH SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         78.56%        73.81%

        61.22%

        35.77%

        85.88%

        25.42%

        34.38%

        52.03%

State         74.16%        58.53%

        47.08%

        42.29%

        81.08%

        27.10%

        31.43%

        51.91%

Percentage of HIGH SCHOOL Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

  

All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         54.99%        49.47%

        25.71%

        8.89%

        61.57%

        6.58%

        14.71%

        22.89%

State         41.03%        35.06%

        15.58%

        10.09%

        46.55%

        10.09%

        6.97%

        19.47%

Percentage of All Students Meeting or Exceeding READING Standards

 

    All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         76.50%        73.27%

        51.27%

        48.21%

        83.40%

        38.47%

        40.07%

        54.70%

State         71.92%        60.40%

        47.34%

        44.93%

        78.74%

        32.35%

        34.90%

        52.67%

Percentage of All Students Meeting or Exceeding MATH Standards

 

      All

        Asian PI

        Hispanic

        Black

        White

        LEP

        SpEd

        FRP

RPS District         70.22%        72.03%

        45.10%

        38.74%

        76.72%

        38.93%

        36.20%

        48.57%

       State         62.32%        58.07%

        38.25%

        32.72%

        68.81%

        31.55%

        29.91%

        43.37%

“I am proud of our students and staff for their continued focus on student success,” said Dr. Romain Dallemand, Superintendent. “At a district level, the proficiency rates for nearly all sub groups are rising for the second year in a row, and once again, our District scores exceed those of the state.”

The MCA-IIs are used to determine whether or not states are meeting target goals for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), as required by the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation. NCLB also requires all students, including nine different subgroups, to be proficient in reading and math by the 2013-2014 school year.

During the month of July, Rochester Public Schools will review MCA-II data for accuracy, will review AYP preliminary results, and will prepare appropriate AYP appeals to submit to the state. As required by NCLB, schools must meet their target AYP goals in all subgroup populations. Schools that do not meet all their AYP goals are cited by the Minnesota Department of Education and placed on the state’s “Needs Improvement” list.

In August, Rochester Public Schools will report district and school AYP results as well as the Minnesota Department of Education Growth Data for MCA-II tests. MCA-II Science results will also be reported. In September, Rochester Public Schools will complete district specific analysis of school level results and will complete effectiveness studies related to interventions and supports.

Statement from Superintendent Romain Dallemand regarding MCA-II Results

I am very pleased that students’ proficiency on the District’s MCA-II assessments results increased again this year. This is important feedback to the District and an indication that we’re on the right track for raising proficiency for all students. At a District level, the proficiency rates for nearly all sub groups are rising for the second year in a row, and once again, our District scores exceed those of the state.

As part of the Five Year Plan, we will continue to monitor student achievement, will learn from successful instructional strategies employed in classrooms across the District, and will adjust instructional strategies where improvements and growth must be made.

Student success is a result of the dedication of many people. I am grateful to the teachers, paraprofessionals, administrators, parents, and community for their hard work and continued focus on the proficiency of all our students.  Most of all, I am pleased that our students’ efforts have resulted in continued growth.

FYI: Adversity Index

Friday, June 12th, 2009

graph

MSNBC and Moody’s Economy have released an online Adversity Index that measures the economic health of 381 metro areas and all 50 states. 

Each area is identified as being in recession, at risk, recovering or expanding. You can explore changes in the four components of the index: employment, housing starts, housing prices and industrial production, each shown as a percentage change from a year earlier. (The change in housing prices will be updated at the end of the quarter.) 

To reach the index click here:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29976394/

All Means All: Great Education Results Celebrated

Friday, June 5th, 2009

johnandpatweb2

Statement of community members responding to recent reports of results of the Five Year Plan initiatives - June 5, 2009

Two weeks ago, representatives of a variety of community organizations interested in education gathered for presentations on programs and initiatives included in the district’s Five-Year Plan. These presentations provided the results of the most recent assessments of student progress.

These results are remarkable. Frankly, those of us who heard them that morning were thrilled. We committed ourselves to sharing this good news – this great news – with the community.

While the community has spent much of the year focused on other issues, something else was going on in schools and homes throughout the district. Teachers were teaching. Parents were engaging. Students were learning. Gaps were closing.

The results reported to us on May 22nd demonstrate that, in the first year of its implementation, the district’s Five-Year Plan to close the opportunity gap is indeed succeeding. It is succeeding to the benefit of all students- all students.

Even though there may be questions about our school district, we believe the most important question is: how are our students doing? The answer given in these results is: our students are doing better – in fact, better than we hoped.

Even though there may be questions about any plan implemented to improve education in our district, we believe the most important question is: is the plan working? The answer given in these results is: the plan is working – in fact, it is exceeding our expectations.

The results also begin to provide an answer to that other question with which the community wrestles – can all students improve their performance? The answer to that question is: yes, all students can improve - all means all.

Here are the results we heard that we want to share with the community:

(1) ALL MEANS ALL.
a. Not only is the achievement gap narrowing, the proficiency gap for all students is closing.
b. Registrations for advance placement [AP] classes are up in all three district high schools.

(2) ALL MEANS EVEN MORE THAN WE EXPECTED.
a. The Five Year Plan interventions that provided additional time and support needed for students who have historically underachieved are good for ALL students.
b. Students enrolled in Read 180, Mathletics, and Voyager Math are showing exceptional growth.
c. These results are being seen not only in Tier 1 schools where the Five Year Plan interventions have been initially launched, but also (in the case of Read 180 and Voyager Math) in Tier 2 and 3 schools that have adapted these interventions early based upon the strong research supporting them.

(3) ALL TAKES ALL.
a. These results are not an indication of a school system that was somehow broken and is now getting somehow fixed. On the contrary, these results are possible because a school system that was strong is now getting stronger. These results are built upon a strong educational foundation already in place.
b. ALL that a student experiences in our schools – the complete educational experience that includes excellent instruction and a strong core curriculum – produces these results.
c. ALL of us who care about students are required to help them make these results possible.

In sum, here are what we believe are the important questions for this district and the answers the results are now giving us:allmeansall

• Are students doing better? YES
• Is the Five Year Plan working? YES
• Does all mean all? YES

In closing we would add:

• Do we owe ALL who have taken up the hard work of making our schools stronger our thanks and continued support? YES
• Do we owe ALL students - who do the hard work of learning, who embrace these opportunities to achieve and improve - our admiration, best wishes, and whatever it takes to ensure their continued success? Emphatically, yes, YES, we do.

____________________

The following persons were participants in the discussions that resulted in the statement above (affiliations are included for reference): Dave Beal, United Way of Olmsted County; John Edmonds, Olmsted County; Karen Erlenbusch, United Way of Olmsted County; Patrick Gannon, Child Care Resource and Referral; Jenny Hegland, Winona State University – Rochester; Margo Herman, University of Minnesota Youth Work Institute; Kay Hocker, Diversity Council; Marlene Jehnke, Girl Scouts; Colleen Maddox, Rochester Community and Technical College; Mike Podulke, Olmsted County; Nancy Sears, Reading Center; Sandy Simar, Head Start; Kristine Stensland, Child Care Resource and Referral; George B. Thompson, Community Member; Barbara Zelinske, Reading Center.

This group is grateful for the opportunity to discuss the results reported above with the following representatives of the district: Fred Daly, Board member; Susanne Griffin-Ziebart, Executive Director of School Improvement and Accountability; and Rachel Hicks, Communication Coordinator.

Free-Tax Preparation Partners Help Return Over $1.1 Million to Olmsted County

Friday, May 15th, 2009

1040-blue-web1This tax season United Way of Olmsted County Financial Stability Partnership once again joined with the long-standing free tax preparation services provided by AARP Tax-Aide Program to promote free tax preparation in Olmsted County. Other partners include The Salvation Army. The Rochester Senior Center, and Hawthorne Education Center as well as the Internal Revenue Service and the Minnesota Department of Revenue.

AARP Tax-Aide Program had five tax sites in Olmsted County that were located in Rochester, Eyota, and Stewartville. These sites provided free tax preparation for low- and middle-income families. 2,256 federal tax returns were filed by AARP Tax-Aide counselors; 36% of the returns filed were eligible for the Earned Income Tax credit (EITC). An additional 1,198 tax returns were filed and included state only, prior year, and amended returns.

EITC is the largest and most effective federal aid program for low- to moderate-income workers.  For many eligible families, the EITC can increase their annual income by as much as 15 percenteitcfamily_web4.

Recognizing that free tax preparation services and EITC’s potential economic benefit to both families and communities, the Financial Stability Partnership supports educating families about the availability and benefits of the EITC and providing support services, such as free tax preparation, to facilitate receipt of the credit as well as the importance of being “banked.” Unbanked individuals and families were referred to US Bank and First Alliance Credit Union to set up an account prior to their tax appointment to take advantage of direct deposit refunds, getting their refund faster.

When combined with the Minnesota Working Families Credit, an estimated $1,138,175 in tax credits was returned to Olmsted County households though AARP Tax-Aide’s free-tax preparation sites. Because these services were provide without charge, families and individuals received more of the dollars for which they qualified.

Further, economists suggest that every increased dollar received by low and moderate-income families has a multiplier effect of between 1.5 to 2 times the original amount, in terms of its impact on the local economy and how much money is spent in and around the communities where these families and individuals live. Using the conservative estimate, for every $1 in EITC funds received, $1.50 ends up being spent locally.

Free tax preparation is still available for filing property tax and rent credit. Even if you don’t pay taxes, you may still qualify for these credits. You can even sign up to file a regular or back year tax return. Call United Way’s 2-1-1 or 507-287-2000 to set up an appointment.

DPI - Discharge Planning Initiative

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

discharge-blog

Mayo Clinic, Olmsted Medical Center (OMC), and United Way of Olmsted County are pleased to announce a partnership that has resulted in the development of a new on-line database called the Discharge Planning Initiative (DPI). In real time, this tool assists acute and post-acute care facilities by expediting communications and patient placement.

The DPI tool uses the latest web-based technology to create a new level of efficiency within the discharge planning process. Our expectation is that this tool becomes the primary communication device for Mayo and OMC discharge planners and Olmsted County social workers for available bed types within each post acute care facility. Discharge planners and social workers can use the DPI tool as their one stop in locating an appropriate facility throughout the day thus reducing the number of calls made to find available beds. Care facilities see reduced number of calls, greater visibility of available services, empty beds filled more quickly, and increased number of referrals. -more-